Skip to content

Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ)

Definition

Cost of poor Quality (COPQ) refers to the costs incurred by an organization due to defects, inefficiencies, and errors in product or service delivery. It includes the financial impact of delivering substandard quality, both in internal operations and external customer-facing activities.

Description

Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) quantifies the hidden costs of delivering subpar experiences, including rework, returns, churn, lost trust, and inefficiencies — making it a powerful lever for customer satisfaction and profitability.

The relevance and interpretation of this metric shift depending on the model or product:

  • In SaaS, it includes bugs, outages, and poor onboarding
  • In hardware or DTC, it reflects defect rates, support costs, and warranty claims
  • In services, it tracks process inefficiencies or CX breakdowns

A high COPQ means quality issues are draining revenue and loyalty. A reduced COPQ reflects product and ops alignment with customer expectations. Segment by failure type, region, or lifecycle stage to find root causes and savings potential.

Cost of Poor Quality informs:

  • Strategic decisions, like QA investments or lifecycle improvement plans
  • Tactical actions, such as targeted fixes for high-cost failure modes
  • Operational improvements, including training, tooling, and prevention measures
  • Cross-functional alignment, by helping product, ops, and CS teams work toward customer-first delivery at scale

Key Drivers

These are the main factors that directly impact the metric. Understanding these lets you know what levers you can pull to improve the outcome

  • Bug Frequency and Severity in Production: Shipping broken features or workflows increases cost through support burden and customer dissatisfaction.
  • Support Volume and Ticket Reopens: Repeat issues and poor resolutions inflate operational costs.
  • Negative Word of Mouth or Review Impact: Poor quality damages brand trust — leading to lower conversion and higher acquisition costs.

Improvement Tactics & Quick Wins

Actionable ideas to optimize this KPI, from fast, low-effort wins to strategic initiatives that drive measurable impact.

  • If COPQ is rising, categorize incidents by root cause and tackle the top 2–3 systemic issues first.
  • Add automated QA and regression testing pre-release, especially for high-impact features.
  • Run post-incident reviews cross-functionally with product, eng, and support to prevent recurrence.
  • Refine release notes and internal readiness playbooks to improve rollout success and support preparedness.
  • Partner with CS to track support volume and churn linked to known quality issues.

  • Required Datapoints to calculate the metric

    • Internal Failure Costs: Costs of correcting defects found before delivery.
    • External Failure Costs: Costs related to defects discovered by customers.
    • Appraisal Costs: Costs of inspections and quality audits.
    • Prevention Costs: Costs of preventing defects through process improvements and training.

  • Example to show how the metric is derived

    A consumer electronics company evaluates its CoPQ over a quarter:

    • Internal Failure Costs: $50,000 (e.g., rework, testing failures).
    • External Failure Costs: $100,000 (e.g., warranty claims, returns).
    • Prevention Costs: $30,000 (e.g., quality training programs).
    • Appraisal Costs: $20,000 (e.g., inspection and testing).
    • Total CoPQ = $50,000 + $100,000 + $30,000 + $20,000 = $200,000 .

Formula

Formula

\[ \mathrm{Cost\ of\ Poor\ Quality} = \mathrm{Internal\ Failure\ Costs} + \mathrm{External\ Failure\ Costs} + \mathrm{Appraisal\ Costs} + \mathrm{Prevention\ Costs} \]

Data Model Definition

How this KPI is structured in Cube.js, including its key measures, dimensions, and calculation logic for consistent reporting.

cube('QualityCosts', {
  sql: `SELECT * FROM quality_costs`,

  measures: {
    internalFailureCosts: {
      sql: `internal_failure_costs`,
      type: 'sum',
      title: 'Internal Failure Costs',
      description: 'Costs of correcting defects found before delivery.'
    },
    externalFailureCosts: {
      sql: `external_failure_costs`,
      type: 'sum',
      title: 'External Failure Costs',
      description: 'Costs related to defects discovered by customers.'
    },
    appraisalCosts: {
      sql: `appraisal_costs`,
      type: 'sum',
      title: 'Appraisal Costs',
      description: 'Costs of inspections and quality audits.'
    },
    preventionCosts: {
      sql: `prevention_costs`,
      type: 'sum',
      title: 'Prevention Costs',
      description: 'Costs of preventing defects through process improvements and training.'
    },
    totalCOPQ: {
      sql: `${internalFailureCosts} + ${externalFailureCosts} + ${appraisalCosts} + ${preventionCosts}`,
      type: 'number',
      title: 'Total Cost of Poor Quality',
      description: 'Total costs incurred due to defects, inefficiencies, and errors in product or service delivery.'
    }
  },

  dimensions: {
    id: {
      sql: `id`,
      type: 'number',
      primaryKey: true,
      title: 'ID',
      description: 'Unique identifier for each record.'
    },
    createdAt: {
      sql: `created_at`,
      type: 'time',
      title: 'Created At',
      description: 'Timestamp when the record was created.'
    }
  }
});

Note: This is a reference implementation and should be used as a starting point. You’ll need to adapt it to match your own data model and schema

Positive & Negative Influences

  • Negative influences

    Factors that drive the metric in an undesirable direction, often signaling risk or decline.

    • Bug Frequency and Severity in Production: Higher frequency and severity of bugs lead to increased costs due to the need for additional resources to fix issues and manage customer dissatisfaction.
    • Support Volume and Ticket Reopens: Increased support volume and ticket reopens indicate unresolved issues, leading to higher operational costs and resource allocation.
    • Negative Word of Mouth or Review Impact: Negative reviews and word of mouth damage brand reputation, resulting in decreased sales and increased marketing costs to regain customer trust.
    • Rework and Scrap Costs: Defects in production lead to rework and scrap, directly increasing the cost of poor quality by wasting materials and labor.
    • Warranty and Return Costs: High warranty claims and product returns due to quality issues increase costs and reduce profitability.

  • Positive influences

    Factors that push the metric in a favorable direction, supporting growth or improvement.

    • Quality Assurance and Testing: Investing in thorough quality assurance and testing reduces defects, leading to lower costs associated with poor quality.
    • Employee Training and Development: Improved employee skills and knowledge lead to fewer errors and higher quality outputs, reducing COPQ.
    • Customer Feedback and Continuous Improvement: Actively seeking and implementing customer feedback helps identify and rectify quality issues, reducing future costs.
    • Process Optimization: Streamlining processes to eliminate inefficiencies reduces errors and defects, thereby lowering COPQ.
    • Supplier Quality Management: Ensuring high-quality inputs from suppliers reduces defects in the final product, decreasing the cost of poor quality.

Involved Roles & Activities

Funnel Stage & Type

  • AAARRR Funnel Stage

    This KPI is associated with the following stages in the AAARRR (Pirate Metrics) funnel:

    Retention

  • Type

    This KPI is classified as a Lagging Indicator. It reflects the results of past actions or behaviors and is used to validate performance or assess the impact of previous strategies.

Supporting Leading & Lagging Metrics

  • Leading

    These leading indicators influence this KPI and act as early signals that forecast future changes in this KPI.

    • Error Rate: Error Rate directly influences Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) by signaling the frequency of defects and process failures. Higher error rates are predictive of increased rework, scrap, and warranty claims, all of which drive COPQ up. Monitoring error rate gives advance warning on potential spikes in quality-related costs.
    • Ticket Volume: Ticket Volume is a leading indicator of support and product-related issues. A surge in support tickets often precedes higher COPQ as it reflects underlying defects, process failures, or usability issues that require additional resources to resolve, thereby increasing rework and associated costs.
    • Drop-Off Rate: Drop-Off Rate, especially in key customer or operational journeys, suggests friction or failure points in processes. High drop-off rates may indicate process inefficiencies or defects that later materialize as increased COPQ through rework, lost productivity, or customer complaints.
    • Activation Rate: Low Activation Rate can signal onboarding or product experience issues that often result in downstream support needs, rework, and customer dissatisfaction. These, in turn, contribute to higher COPQ as more resources are required to address activation failures.
    • Customer Health Score: Customer Health Score aggregates signals related to product usage, satisfaction, and engagement. Deteriorating scores frequently precede spikes in COPQ, as unhealthy customers are more likely to experience product issues, submit tickets, or churn due to quality lapses.

  • Lagging

    These lagging indicators confirm, quantify, or amplify this KPI and help explain the broader business impact on this KPI after the fact.

    • Cost per Resolution: Cost per Resolution quantifies the average expense of solving customer issues. When COPQ rises, Cost per Resolution often increases as well, since more resources are required to address the higher volume and complexity of quality-related problems.
    • Complaints Received: Complaints Received is a direct reflection of customer-facing quality failures. Trends in complaints help confirm and quantify the externalized impact of COPQ, validating whether internal quality costs are translating to real customer pain.
    • Customer Churn Rate: Customer Churn Rate quantifies the ultimate business impact of sustained poor quality. High COPQ often leads to increased churn, as customers leave due to dissatisfaction with defects or service failures, amplifying the long-term cost.
    • Customer Support Tickets: Customer Support Tickets summarize the total demand for remediation resulting from quality issues. High COPQ is often mirrored by elevated ticket volume, providing a detailed breakdown of where poor quality is impacting customers.
    • Net Profit Margin: Net Profit Margin is negatively affected by higher COPQ since increased costs from defects, rework, and inefficiencies directly erode profitability. Tracking both together helps connect quality costs with overall business performance.